Hillary Clinton is no stranger to Republican animosity. She has arguably endured harsher and more frequent criticism from the Right, over a lengthier period of time, than any other modern public figure. She is also no amateur when it comes to navigating her way through Congressional hearings. She has always been proficient at holding her head high in the face of controversy, whether or not any of the “fault” for such turmoil truly rested on her shoulders. After months of vilifying the Obama administration and demonizing Clinton over the Benghazi terror attacks, Republicans have been eagerly awaiting the opportunity to theatrically grill her in front of plenty of cameras. When her testimony on Benghazi was briefly delayed due to illness, she was accused of faking it to avoid facing Congress. One can’t help but wonder whether these buffoons are suffering from concussions of their own.
Motley Moose – Archive
Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics
Archive for January 2013
US Policy in the Middle East
The Daily F Bomb – Thursday, 1/24
Have a Thrilling Thursday, my Thermonuclear F-Bombers!
If there were a talking filibuster and you were a Senator filibustering something, what would YOU use (book, etc.) as your filibuster talk? What is the most beautiful rural place you have ever seen? What is the most beautiful urban place you have ever seen? Risotto or Paella? What is your favorite one hit by a one hit wonder?What makes your most annoying neighbor so annoying?
My Twitter Stream was muddied a bit, mostly by the Hillary Hearings.
Judging by twitter, the drink lines at Dem-sponsored inaugural events are reminiscent of Florida polling places. COINCIDENCE?!
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) January 23, 2013
“With all due respect” is the diplomatic version of “Bless your heart”#Benghazi #Hilary2016
— SpreadTheWord (@word_34) January 23, 2013
In 2 min, McCain has done a more thorough questioning of Hillary than his entire vetting process of Palin.
— Jennifer Hayden (@Scout_Finch) January 23, 2013
meet the press will have mccain on to review mccain’s performance about mccain.
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) January 23, 2013
Problem with hearings like this: John McCain is interested in what John McCain has to say, not what Hillary Clinton has to say.
— Alex Koppelman (@AlexKoppelman) January 23, 2013
Sen Rand Paul says Hillary willfully negligent. Know who else is willfully negligent? Whoever cuts his hair.
— Jennifer Hayden (@Scout_Finch) January 23, 2013
EXPLAINER: Rand Paul just leaves “according to World Net Daily” off of his accusations to avoid repetition.
— LOLGOP (@LOLGOP) January 23, 2013
Hillary Clinton has approximately the IQ of all GOP senators combined on the senate foreign relations committee.
— Frank Vdl (@fvdlfvdl) January 23, 2013
I saw a blonde woman thrash a bunch of guys on TV this morning & just realized it was Hilary Clinton & not Kill Bill pt 1.
— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) January 23, 2013
Don’t mix metaphors with prescription drugs.
— daveweigel (@daveweigel) January 24, 2013
Now let’s talk History!
Thursday Morning Moose Check-in and Open Thread for the Meeses
Make sure you let your peeps know where to find you!
Packing Asians
This is the third part in a series of posts examining how to create super-packed districts of one race. The other posts in this series pack blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and whites.
More below.
Open Thread for commonmass and GMB02 Updates Started 1/26
The Moose has graciously allowed this post to serve as an open thread for us to share any updates we find about the dire health situation of GMB02.
While commonmass hasn’t put up a new diary in two days he is commenting in others. What we know as of now is that GMB02 is becoming a bit aware of what’s going on and the ventilator is at a lower setting. So at least a bit of positivity.
Please add whatever you find and if it’s big news I’ll edit the diary and bring it into the body. Otherwise check here as you see new comments added.
Any other thoughts to help facilitate the flow of info? Also, if it bogs down or falls off anyone just put up a new one.
Thanks Moose.
My Little Miracle
Last week, my life was transformed in a most marvelous way: I became a grandmother, quite an accomplishment for an infertile person who spent nearly two decades in the pursuit of motherhood.
I’ll spare you the details, but suffice it to say that both my ex-husband and I brought our own biological limitations to the conception process. Either of us paired with someone else might have been able to reproduce, but that really wasn’t the point. Still, when one marries into a large Irish Catholic family, childlessness is a suboptimal outcome. In the end, though, my childlessness enabled me to divorce amicably and without complication after 19.9 years of a marriage that lacked a great deal more than the pitter patter of little feet.
In an ironic twist, I then married Mr. Carolina, a man who’d fathered two sons, then had a vasectomy back in the 1970’s, when this was A Very Progressive thing to do. Now that I’ve turned the corner of menopause, it’s clear that reproduction is off the table… not that I would have wanted children in this marriage. Relations with my two step sons who were in high school and college when I married their father were already strained. The older son (“James”) remained estranged for over a dozen years; the other (“Drew”) who was always closer to his father held out for a short while, then yielded to the inexorable pull of love and enjoyed a great relationship with both of us.
Wednesday Doggies or the Woozles of the Wednesday
Those of you who already either know tricia or know of tricia know that she is a massive pootie person. She moved into an apartment and now has a pootie, named Princess Ashley; however she grew up with both cats & dogs and she loves both. She does not discriminate against any animal & loves animal photos of all kinds. Please enjoy the following and add any photos that you think the community would like to see. Now, enjoy the photos & have some fun.
i’ve been asked by tricia to write today’s doggy diary here as opposed to cross posting her wednesday woozles from that orange place. i’m new to this so bear with me please. also, flickr is hiccoughing and my red panda pix can’t be transferred or posted right now. i’ll try for that later. thank you all, have fun!
Gifted and Learning Disabled (twice as weird, with extra fun)
Anyone who thinks about it knows that you can be disabled and gifted. But anyone who’s disabled can tell you that a lot of people don’t think. Otherwise, why would people talk louder to people in wheelchairs? Leg bone connected to the ear bone?
But what if your disability is related to …. your BRAIN? Like mine is. I’m learning disabled. Well, TECHNICALLY, my label is MINIMAL BRAIN DYSFUNCTION. (DYS? WTF? That’s just to make life harder for the dyslexic folk out there). But the label that fits me best is probably NLD. Nonverbal learning disorder. That is, I have problems with things that are NON verbal. Well, except, the expert on NLD says I am not supposed to have a sense of humor. OOPS! Where do I go to return it?
Anyway, I’m learning disabled. Or my brain is dysfunctional. Something’s wrong, and whatever it is is related to my brain. AND I’M GIFTED. Gosh! You mean my brain works too well AND too badly???? At the same time? Yup.
But a lot of people don’t believe it. I guess those people think everyone who is fat has to be tall. (shhhh! No sense of humor!).
It confuses people. It sure as heck confused the psychologist who told my parents when I was 5 that I would never go to college. ‘Cause, you see, I got my BA when I was 20, having skipped a year of HS and done college in 3 years.
Whatever you think of IQ tests (personally, I think they can be useful but are easy to abuse) my results are odd. Long ago, on a WISC (that’s Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) I got subtest scores from 60 to 160. More recently, in grad school (hey! I wasn’t supposed to go to college! What’s with grad school? Bad boy!) I helped out a friend who was studying to be able to give the WAIS (ah ha! Wechsler Adult Instelligence Scales. Shouldn’t it be WISA?) I got subtest scores from 70 to unscored, because she didn’t know what to do when I answered some arithmetic questions before she finished asking them (well, I just figured the question, then the answer! Doesn’t everyone do that?).
Now, if your whole IQ is 70, you’re probably going to have some problems in life. And if your whole IQ is 170, you are probably going to have some problems in life. And if some of your IQ is 70 and some is 170….. well, life is just going to be smooth sailing, all the way! (Just checking to see if you were paying attention!)
OK, I know a lot of people don’t like IQ tests. I happen to know quite a bit about them (my PhD is in psychometrics, that’s the study of measurement of psychological traits) but this diary is not about their merits or demerits (and let’s not get into that in the comments…. if you want my thoughts on them, I’d be glad to write another diary).
What do people say when you tell them that you are learning disabled AND good at reading and math? Different people react different ways:
1) “You can’t be LD, you’re so bright!” IOW “you can’t be fat, you’re so tall!”
2) “You can’t be LD and gifted” IOW “No one who is tall can be fat.”
3) “All LDs involve reading or math” IOW “Children know everything adults do, except how to read and do math”
4) “How can that be?” or “What are your LD?” or something similar. IOW “Hey! Maybe Peter knows more about being Peter than I do! I might learn something. Cool”
I’ll assume that you’ve all done something in the 4 vein.
What are my LD? An easy way to summarize them is that I’m bad at anything involving time or space. But that summary might not help much.
Things involving time subdivides into two categories:
a) When things happened
b) How long things take to happen
I am bad at both. Some examples of the first:
As an adolescent, I was hit by a car and I had an operation on my eyes. I don’t remember when exactly either of them happened.
As an adult, I got a PhD and became a father for the first time. I have to THINK to be able to tell which happened first, it’s not intuitive. I remember the date of my PhD (1999) and my older son’s birthday (1996) so…. child first!
Some examples of the second: I have no intuitive sense of how long it takes to do things, unless I’ve done them MANY times before. Like a dozen times. And, if I haven’t done it in a while, I forget. I’ve been from my apartment to LaGuardia airport a lot. But not for a while. Err…. half an hour? An hour?
How long will it take me to walk to my son’s school? I’ve done it a lot. But I have to figure it out: It’s about a mile. That’s about 20 blocks. I walk about a minute a block, and voila!
On to space!
I don’t remember where I put things. AT ALL. I know, a lot of people will say this, but with me, it’s extreme, and it happens a lot. Like, one day, I came home carrying a cup of juice. I had to go to the bathroom, so I put the juice down. Then I peed. Then I looked for the juice. For 10 minutes. Our apartment isn’t that large!
I don’t recognize people. (I can remember names much better than faces; for example, I remember the names of people I went to HS with, but not their faces). Once, I ran into my father on the street. I looked at him. 30 seconds later: Oh Hi Dad!
I can’t give directions. Turn uhhhhh. left? right? ummm one of those!
I don’t remember what is where. One time, I asked my wife if we had a toaster oven. She said “Yeah, it’s next to the coffee maker you use every morning” (I looked, and there it was!).
So, can you be gifted and learning disabled? You bet you can. I am.
I’ll try to answer questions.
Scientology: A Religion, but a Threat to Mental Health?
Hope the Moose don’t mind if I share the English language version of an article for the Polish weekly magazine Krytyka Polityczyna about Scientology. The story of my father is the subject of my next book for Unbound, which should go live in the next two weeks. This is a more impersonal take the religious claims of Scientology which will also form the basis for a talk I have to give in May. Comments therefore very much welcome, both for that and the forthcoming book
Though it claims to be one of the world’s fasting growing religions, and now holds over $1 billion in liquid assets, last year wasn’t great for the Church of Scientology. The news that its most famous public adherent and advocate, Tom Cruise, was divorcing fellow actor Katie Holmes brought with it a rash of renewed criticisms of the futuristic religion, including a tweet from the media mogul Rupert Murdoch that it was “creepy – maybe evil’. This year started out even worse with the publication of a major expose into the practices of the religion. Lawrence Wright, who won the Pulitzer prize in 2007 for his analysis of Al Qaeda, The Looming Towers, has just released his next big opus: Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief. The book isn’t available in the UK thanks to our draconian libel laws, but Wright’s damaging allegations about bullying, mismanagement and intimidation have been widely reviewed and publicised. Rarely, in its 60 year history, has Scientology’s reputation in its American heartland and homeland been at such a low.
Nonetheless, a greater threat to the new age church may not lie in US free speech but in European legislation. A month ago, after five years of investigation, Belgian prosecutors announced they were charging the church as a ‘criminal organisation’ on the basis it practiced extortion, "pseudo-medicine" and the keeping of records that contravene privacy laws. Though there are only a five hundred Scientologist s in Belgium, Brussels houses the church’s European HQ, and the legal case could be crippling to the group in Europe.