Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Tough Choices on Foreclosure Settlement

By the time the robo-signing scandal had spread across all fifty states their attorneys general started looking for a coordinated and comprehensive settlement with the banks:


The current settlement stems from revelations in late 2010 that banks had filed hundreds of thousands of flawed and fraudulent foreclosure documents in their rush to keep up with a tidal wave of delinquent loans wrought by the housing crisis, a practice known as “robosigning.”

Under the proposed deal, the five banks involved – Wells Fargo, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase, Ally Financial and Citigroup – would agree to end those practices and overhaul the often-convoluted way they deal with borrowers trying to stay in their homes. They also would pay about $25 billion that would go toward lowering loan balances for borrowers who owe more than their houses are worth, helping others refinance at lower rates and paying up to $2,000 to hundreds of thousands of people who lost homes to foreclosure.

Brady Dennis – Proposed settlement with banks over foreclosure practices dealt a setback Washington Post 8 Feb 12

The Obama administration also sought some relief for a broad segment of affected homeowners rather than individual prosecutions of specific cases.  Sounds good?  Well, maybe not so much, as the legal ramifications of the settlement are still open to interpretation:


In effect, the White House was willing to sell blanket immunity to the originators and distributors of mortgages over the past decade. The price of this legal protection would have been low. Understandably, bankers are still keen to take the offer.

Simon Johnson – Last chance on mortgage mess Politico 22 Jan 12

Those seeking a tougher stance on bank malfeasance and a broader inquiry, potentially resulting in criminal prosecutions, into the complex mortgage retail and securitisation practices which largely precipitated the 2008 crash have been reluctant to go along with this proposal.

Here’s where it gets a bit messy.  Forty or so state attorneys general have negotiated this settlement proposal with notable dissent from California, New York and other states.  New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman had become a focus for anti-settlement progressives who agreed that broader investigations, and possible fraud prosecutions, were warranted:


Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, the top state official leading the negotiations, removed Schneiderman from the coalition’s executive committee last summer, saying he had “actively worked to undermine” the efforts to reach a settlement. The move backfired, with some lawmakers, editorial boards and liberal activists rallying behind Schneiderman and praising his skepticism of the talks and his push for more in-depth inquiries.

Brady Dennis – Proposed settlement with banks over foreclosure practices dealt a setback Washington Post 8 Feb 12

Schneiderman has been unequivocal in his objections:


“It’s sort of like being in criminal case and having someone say, ‘OK, you’ve got me on this gun charge. I’ll plead guilty, but I need you to give me a release from anything else I might have done, before you look into anything else I might have done,” Schneiderman said on WNYC last month. “You don’t do that.”

Loren Berlin – Eric Schneiderman Sues BofA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase Over Electronic Mortgage Fraud Huffington Post 3 Feb 12

While the settlement deal remains somewhat flexible the negotiating attorneys general and the banks have been increasingly pressing for agreement, threatening to exclude recalcitrant states from a pro-rata settlement.  Then in January Obama made a significant announcement during the SOTU speech:


WASHINGTON — During his State of the Union address tonight, President Obama will announce the creation of a special unit to investigate misconduct and illegalities that contributed to both the financial collapse and the mortgage crisis.

The office, part of a new Unit on Mortgage Origination and Securitization Abuses, will be chaired by Eric Schneiderman, the New York attorney general, according to a White House official.

Schneiderman is an increasingly beloved figure among progressives for his criticism of a proposed settlement between the 50 state attorneys general and the five largest banks.

Sam Stein – EXCLUSIVE: Obama To Announce Mortgage Crisis Unit Chaired By New York Attorney General Schneiderman Huffington Post 22 Jan 12

This was followed shortly thereafter by a new suit from the New York Attorney General’s office:


Three big banks were hit on Friday with yet another lawsuit related to wrongful foreclosures. Democratic New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed suit against Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo for deceptive and fraudulent use of a private database used to register mortgages, according to a Friday press release from his office.

Loren Berlin – Eric Schneiderman Sues BofA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase Over Electronic Mortgage Fraud Huffington Post 3 Feb 12

One interpretation of this is that Schneiderman and the negotiating attorneys general had some convergence on an agreement, on the assumption that New York wouldn’t deal themselves out of the proposed settlement:


“If the deal terms had been decided six months ago, a state couldn’t have pursued this kind of lawsuit,” said the source. “The fact that Schneiderman has filed this case suggests that the terms of the deal have changed since then.”

Loren Berlin – Eric Schneiderman Sues BofA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase Over Electronic Mortgage Fraud Huffington Post 3 Feb 12

On the other hand there has been an interesting hiccup today which may bear watching closely:


New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman abruptly called off a news conference at which he could have provided a crucial endorsement of a proposed settlement with some of the nation’s biggest banks over shoddy foreclosure practices.

Schneiderman’s unexplained last-minute postponement cast another cloud of uncertainty over the ongoing negotiations, which have dragged on for more than 16 months. State and federal officials have been intent on finalizing the deal by the end of the week.

Brady Dennis – Proposed settlement with banks over foreclosure practices dealt a setback Washington Post 8 Feb 12

So, what gives?  It seems pretty clear that the Obama administration is trying to stake out some sympathetic territory here for the upcoming election:


The lack of a pursuit of pre-crisis “crimes” remains a big, public frustration. We have no idea if this will go anywhere, but obviously this shows that The White House is still aware of this issue, and also shows that it likely wants to put Wall Street on trial (figuratively and perhaps literally) in the runup to the election.

Joe Weisenthal – Obama Is Announcing A Brand New Group To Go After Fraud That Caused The Financial Crisis Business Insider 24 Jan 12

Given Attorney General Schneiderman’s new role and the importance of holdouts California and New York on this settlement, not to mention the apparent “urgency” surrounding closing this deal, it will be interesting to see what developments arise in coming days and weeks.  Robo-signing, while clearly criminal, is merely the tip of the potential fraud iceberg.  Well worth watching.


34 comments

  1. Shaun Appleby

    On why Schneiderman may have balked:


    One person familiar with the negotiations said several banks wanted Schneiderman to withdraw a suit he filed on Friday against prominent financial firms, saying they had acted deceptively by filing erroneous and fraudulent foreclosure documents through a popular electronic mortgage registry designed to allow firms to save time and money by bypassing local property recording requirements.

    The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks were ongoing. It was unclear whether Schneiderman had intended on Tuesday to address the status of those lawsuits during the news conference.

    Brady Dennis – Proposed settlement with banks over foreclosure practices dealt a setback Washington Post 8 Feb 12

    On the other hand he surely would have known that the lawsuit would have precipitated a reaction and may have violated the terms of the proposed settlement.  Seems like he is playing hardball and I hope the Obama administration either backs him up or at least sits on its hands.  This is a critical moment for Obama to choose which side his administration is on.

    My only disappointment has been the coddling of the banks; with his Wall Street donation pool shrinking maybe we have an opportunity for a second term without such a heavy influence by Goldman Sachs’ alumni club in federal appointments.  Paul Krugman for Treasury Secretary?

  2. Shaun Appleby

    The banking lobby suggests they’ve got a deal:


    WASHINGTON – California Attorney General Kamala Harris is expected to join a multi-state settlement with the top five mortgage servicers and New York’s AG could soon follow, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.

    New York AG Eric Schneiderman and Harris have been the two biggest hold outs on the proposed settlement, which had the backing of more than 40 states as of a Monday night deadline. According to two sources, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the deal, Harris is now prepared to sign on.

    New York, meanwhile, appears increasingly likely to join the settlement, according to the sources.

    Kate Davidson – Calif. Expected to Join Mortgage Settlement, N.Y. Likely to Follow American Banker 8 Feb 12

    There have already been a few false alarms and much wishful thinking along these lines and it is reasonable to remember AG Beau Biden’s perspective, “Delaware’s timeline for agreeing to the settlement is dictated by whether our concerns are met.”  I’m guessing he has a “lobbyist” in the White House.

    Still, there seems to be some arm-twisting going on here.  We’ll see if the Obama administration’s electoral concerns trump those of Democratic attorneys general in California, New York, Massachusetts, Nevada and Delaware.

  3. Shaun Appleby

    A somewhat related criminal investigation results in an indictment:


    A grand jury in Missouri handed up the 136-count indictment late last week charging Georgia-based DocX — a subsidiary of the massive mortgage processor Lender Processing Services — and its founder and former president Lorraine O. Brown, with forgery. The indictment alleges that DocX employees fabricated signatures on hundreds of real estate documents, some used in foreclosures.

    “This is the first time any grand jury in the country has indicted a corporation or a high-level executive at a corporation for ‘robo-signing,'” Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster told The Huffington Post. “The grand jury is alleging that the documents have false signatures on them, that the notarizations are fraudulent and that it was all done with an intent to deceive. If that’s true, it makes the [foreclosure] documents forgeries.”

    David Levine – In DocX Case, Robo-Signing Forgery Charge Hits Top Executive Huffington Post 8 Feb 12

    Might go some way toward explaining the “urgency” of the settlement, doncha’ think?  Maybe the bank executives need to sharpen their pencils instead of digging a hole for themselves:


    “I think it’s fair to say that the banks are becoming an obstacle to completing this settlement now,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    Loren Berlin – National Mortgage Settlement Doesn’t Protect Against Future Fraud Charges, Banks Fear Huffington Post 8 Feb 12

    Hmmm…  Tough choices all around.  Nobody looks good in an orange jumpsuit.

  4. Shaun Appleby

    Unofficial claim the deal is sealed:


    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and California Attorney General Kamala Harris are joining the national mortgage servicing settlement, making a deal that includes all 50 states all but inevitable, according to a source who spoke Wednesday evening on condition of anonymity.

    “It’s hard to see any state staying out of the deal if California is in,” said the source.

    Loren Berlin – National Mortgage Settlement All But Inevitable As California, New York Join Deal Huffington Post 8 Feb 12

    The devil, as always, is in the detail.  We’ll see that soon apparently.

  5. HappyinVT

    why is the White House involved in negotiations between the states’ Attorneys General and the banks in the first place?

  6. fogiv

    Schneiderman to left: “Take yes for an answer.”

    Asked if progressives should be skeptical of the administration’s assurances, given the lack of accountability so far, Schneiderman insisted that Obama’s private and public assurances have left him convinced he is serious about a real accounting.

    “He took ownership of this,” Schneiderman. “Sometimes people on the left have to take yes for an answer. The President is accepting the challenge. It’s time for progressives to say, `okay, he’s moving with us now, he’s using resources of government to aggressively pursue the malefactors of great wealth, as Teddy Roosevelt put it.'”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Comments are closed.