Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

A Trust-Based Economy

Met a couple of interesting folks here in the Budweiser Brewhouse in Atlanta Hartsfield airport.  Alex Orr and friend work in the film industry in Los Angeles.  Alex has produced a movie called Bloodcar which was pirated a week before release, and he couldn’t be happier.

Photobucket

In the hard world of independent film production, it is near impossible to get a good piece of work seen, much less make any money at it.  Because his film was ripped into digital format and placed up on BitTorrent and other file sharing media, Bloodcar has developed a following and Alex has sold DVDs and merchandising that he would have never done if he could have locked down the film to a “pay-only” format.

This plays directly into a long-held belief I have had about proper capitalism.  There is an incorrect belief among many in the producer and consumer worlds that capitalism works best when you cheat the consumer, abuse the worker and lie to your dear old mother.

Bullocks.

The truth is that people are naturally decent, naturally honest, naturally fair.  It is part of the social contract that stretches back to our earliest primate ancestors and has not been lost despite common cynicisms of today.  When business is done based on this truism you enter a trust-based economy, something I think is finding its way into our world a little more every day.

You can test this, too.  Take $100 and give it to a person.  Tell them that they have to give some of it to a third person, and that person gets to decide if they want to keep what they received or have the entire $100 returned to you.  If the second person gives the third person less than $20, there is a greater than 80% likelihood that the third person will refuse it and you will get your $100 back.

Why is this?  By the self-interest argument that has been the basis of modern capitalism and economics for most of the last century, the second person should give the third person $0.01, and the third person should say “a penny is better than nothing” and keep it.  But that stretches the natural perception of a Fair Deal.

I have tried this myself, in 1998, on as large a capitalist scale as is reasonably possible.  Presented with a licensing issue that caused undue grief with the Cisco PIX firewall products, I had the license enforcement ripped out and told the world.  “You can buy the $16,000 license and use the product in full $40,000 mode, but you are supposed to buy a license upgrade when you pass the given usage points.”

Three years later, the percentage of license upgrade purchases as compared to overall sales was precisely the same, which by that point amounted to millions of dollars per month.

I have been arguing this point with the music and creative industries for close to twenty years.  “Why not put your songs online, instead of only trying to sell tapes/CDs after bar gigs?”  In the first half of the nineties it was a resounding “Hell No!” in response.  “This is my stuff, and I will make people pay to hear it!”  The RIAA is to this day trying to sue its customers into submission.  Today, however, more and more artists are realizing that by assuming a trust relationship with their customers they can have an advantage over the embedded powers, moreover they stand a chance of getting their product experienced out in the world.  If the product is good, they will come.

I think there is a deeper lesson in all of this.  In a more information-rich market – like what the world is becoming with ubiquitous access to everything – it is more than ever the case that the producers who enter into a trust relationship with their consumers will do well.  As the global economy shudders under what is at its base nothing more than a lack of confidence – a loss of trust – may perhaps be seen the roots of a new global economy.

A trust-based economy.

Dawn here at the Brewhouse knows all about this.  As she serves food and drink to the weary travelers she talks to them honestly, and she is rewarded for it with tips and invitations to visit with her loyal customers.  When the CEOs of more companies learn what Dawn and Alex already know, they will find the doorway to the trust-based economy.

When I get back to the hotel tonight and off of this slow aircard connection, I am going to spend $8 (refundable against the purchase of a DVD) and download Bloodcar.  I trust that it will be worth it.


10 comments

  1. the movie/music business ripped people off for so many years that now they are being forced to find other ways to rip people off.

    hey – do you remember about a year back that radiohead was giving away its new album.  same idea as your new friends and bloody brilliant.

    but the key is technology – it will always be ahead of the curve and i am happy about that.  i should put in a caveat that i wholeheartedly support the arts and in fact worked in film (and may again in the near future) – but its just ridiculous what went on for years and years.

  2. SocialDem

    but people like me who grew up never having to pay for music (well hardly) the record companies are going to have a hard time marketing to. Unless they completely change their business model I believe we will see more and more of indie films like Blood Car and, as a commenter already noted, bands like Radiohead will take it into their own hands and cut the middle man (record companies) and make money off merchandise and the concerts(which is a band’s biggest money maker). People forget the record companies not only have ripped off consumers, but the artists as well. This is exactly why all the music today sounds the same.

  3. spacemanspiff

    I’ve got a lot of friends in the music biz and the record companies are now trying to get some of the concert and live presentations money.

    So they’ll have new artists sign these fucked up agreements in which they give large amounts of money to be signed to a major label.

    They will fool a couple of new acts but once word gets out (uhh, now?) it’s back to the beginning.

    The record companies are tone deaf.

    As SocDem said upthread. I haven’t but a CD since waaaaay back.

    Once I downloaded my first song on Napster …

    … I never bought a CD again.

    EVER.

    It’s like the peeps who invested in their VHS collections only to see how worthless their tapes are now. Why would I invest in DVD’s? So they can come up with a better product with better sound and image (and more space)?

    Uh. Hello BluRay?

    TV shows?

    Uhhh…

    http://www.hulu.com/

    Most artists I know (the smart ones at least) don’t mind having their cd’s bootlegged. As long as their music gets out they can make their money on the live shows.

  4. We just finished watching Hancock on DVD. Awesome movie. I rarely see a movie where I don’t know what’s going to happen next. This one actually kept me guessing. Charlize was her usual great self and Will was also great. I’m tempted to watch it again right now and I’m not even a movie buff.

  5. Hollede

    We can fall apart or we can reshape our world. I have been working on a diary asking what kind of world we want to live in.

    I remember reading a fictional letter from 2025 or 2050. I think it was published in the Nation, but I have been unable to locate it. It was wonderful and was kind of a recitation of all of the positive changes that occurred between now and 2025. I would be so grateful if I could find it again.

    The funniest part went something like this: “after the US rejoined the World Court in 2011, bush and co were convicted of war crimes, but benefited from the worldwide changes in incarceration and punishment. bush served his sentence working at a Falluja diaper factory for the remainder of his life. In all honesty, bush reported that it was the happiest time of his life.”

Comments are closed.