Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Musings on Francis [updated]

As an Episcopalian, I am only an onlooker when it comes to papal elections. Nonetheless, this one is a doozy. Pope Francis (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) is the first pope from the Americas, the first non-European pope for over a millennium, the first pope to use a new name since Pope Lando (from the saeculum obscurum, also called the nadir of the papacy), and the first Jesuit pope.

He has a master’s degree in chemistry, taken before he changed his focus to theology.

Cardinal Bergoglio became known for personal humility, doctrinal conservatism and a commitment to social justice.A simple lifestyle contributed to his reputation for humility. He lived in a small apartment, rather than in the palatial bishop’s residence. He gave up his chauffeured limousine in favor of public transportation.

On the death of Pope John Paul II, Bergoglio was considered one of the papabile cardinals. He participated as a cardinal elector in the 2005 papal conclave that selected Pope Benedict XVI. It has been reported that Bergoglio was in close contention with Ratzinger during the election, until he made an emotional plea that the cardinals should not vote for him.

He has a strong record of support for the poor, but the predictably dismal one for human sexuality in various forms. One report of colluding with the junta does not seem to be backed up by any others.

Perhaps the most intriguing thing is his choice of the name Francis. It is Assisi, not Xavier, so it is not a tribute to the Jesuits but something else. St. Francis in his lifetime was a rather disruptive person; what does that augur for this pope?

It will be very interesting to see what develops.

UPDATE: This live blog by Andrew Sullivan is chock full of insights, too many to copy over – go take a look. Almost all heartening, apart from the human sexuality questions.


12 comments

  1. wordsinthewind

    since no Jesuit has ever been Pope. This will be interesting at least for watching the elements dedicated to holding back change accept the same reality the cardinals did. I’m not Catholic but I am a historian so my interest is how the church uses its power for politics. This seems like a significant shift especially for an institution not known for welcoming change

  2. DeniseVelez

    University – where some of my Jesuit professors were extremely left-of center in their views on social justice.

    I’ve also been to many retreats at the Franciscan Friars and Sisters of the Atonement monastery here in NY, and admire their work.

    I was not expecting the cardinals to elect anyone who supports gay marriage or women as priests, so there is no let-down.

    I am surprised that they elected a non curia insider (thankfully) and his choice of Francis of Assisi’s name is a good sign – for a pope who will more than likely address wealth inequality, and environmental responsibility.

    He will also more than likely support condom use to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (that is radical -in the past, the Bishop in Puerto Rico denied women whose husbands were HIV pos that protection)  

  3. slksfca

    …that he’s the very first Jesuit Pope. I know that the Society of Jesus was in semi-disgrace in the 18th century, but I assumed that at least one Pope since then would have been a Jesuit.

    As for this Pope in general, I share the hope that his choice of name indicates greater concern for the meek and the poor, despite his hardcore conservative stance on social issues. But I have very limited expectations from the Vatican hierarchy, so any progress however tentative is welcome to me.

Comments are closed.