Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Nightly Openthread- Chrisblask: A Wrong Choice, or a Dangerous One?

Tags:

Chrisblask says he’s for Motley Moose- but is he really?

The prospects of him being elected Supreme Bloglord? “It should disturb you.”

Even Chrisblask admits he knows a thing or two about the “abuse of power”.

And he’s been known to consort with foreign nationals that describe Americans as “lying, baiting, erratic and nasty…”

Lying? Nasty? Really, Chris?

Chrisblask. Wrong for Motley Moose, Wrong for America.

This political advertisement sponsored by Primary War Veterans for Truth, and is afiliated with no Netroots party and/or organization.


Categories: Uncategorized.

/ 23 Comments

23 comments

  2. sanguine giant

    You are forgetting that both options could be right.  Everyone knows that Chris is both wrong and dangerous.

    On the mend…

  4. spacemanspiff

    Yeah!

    Really Chris?

    Where is the fucking party at?

    The prospects of him being elected Supreme Bloglord? “It should disturb you.”

    Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Fierce.

  5. fogiv

    Gave me a giggle:

    Compliments of the season (58+ / 0-)

    Compliments of the season

    I am Mr. HANK PAULSON, the SECRETARY of the US TREASURY.In my bank covered an abandoned sum of $700b usd (seven hundred billion U.S.dollars only) in an account that belongs to one of our foreign customer, by name, Mr. George W. Bush, who fled the country along with his wife, Mrs. Laura Bush, in January 2009 to Paraguay.

    Since we got this information, we can not release the money unless somebody applies for it as next of kin or relation to the refugee from the international law as indicated in our banking guidelines.

    It is therefore upon this discovery that I decided to make business with you and release the money to you as the next of kin or relation for safety and subsequent disbursement. It is agreed that a certain percentage of this money will be for you as my foreign partner.

    Upon receipt of your reply I will send to you the text of the application. Thereafter I will visit your country for disbursement according to the percentage agreed.

    Yours faithfully

    Hank Paulson

    by kalmoth on Tue Oct 14, 2008 at 03:41:55 PM PDT

    • fogiv

      The Hollywood Reporter posts that this remake will be written by Red Eye and Disturbia scribe Carl Ellsworth and directed by Dan Bradley, a stunt guy who has also worked as a second AD on flicks from Three Kings to Quantum of Solace. Ellsworth says: “The tone is going to be very intense, very much keeping in mind the post-9/11 world that we’re in. As Red Dawn scared the heck out of people in 1984, we feel that the world is kind of already filled with a lot of paranoia and unease, so why not scare the hell out of people again?”

      Um … maybe because Cuba and Russia never invaded, so as much as it touched on Cold War fears, it was still outside of reality? If they’re playing up 9/11 fears in the world, I think the outcome could prove to be a little different — more reliving horrors than tapping into fears, and who wants to pay to see that?

      What’s truly scary: “As the studio regroups, its executives have realized that the strong MGM library has numerous classic and cult properties it can exploit for a new audience.” I think it’s time to stage a coup, or a hostile takeover.

      http://www.cinematical.com/200…

      • fogiv

        It’s 11:59 on Radio Free America; this is Uncle Sam, with music, and the truth until dawn. Right now I’ve got a few words for some of our brothers and sisters in the occupied zone: “the chair is against the wall, the chair is against the wall”, “john has a long mustache, john has a long mustache”. It’s twelve o’clock, American, another day closer to victory. And for all of you out there, on, or behind the line, this is your song.

    • rfahey22

      The thing is, I saw it when I was a kid and I haven’t seen it since, so I have a feeling that it wouldn’t live up to my memory, anyway.  I remember that there were plenty of plot holes, like how the Russians were somehow able to parachute into middle America with no resistance.

    • Peter Jukes

      I mean 1984 – the USSR was stumbling to collapse. It couldn’t hold down Afghanistan even with a friendly government, let alone invade a properly equipped nation.

Comments are closed.