Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

New Jersey

WSJ Gets Existence of Double Standard Right. Naturally Analyzes it Wrong.

New York Daily News

From today’s Wall Street Journal explaining how Chris Christie is so much better than President Obama when it comes to showing contrition in the wake of misconduct by his underlings:

Not that this should make Mr. Christie or any other potential GOP candidate complacent. Republicans operate under a double media standard that holds them to a much lower scandal threshold. (emphasis my own) In that sense the pathetic New Jersey traffic-lane scandal may be, as Mr. Obama likes to say, a teachable moment.

Perhaps the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal hasn’t watched its sister outlet, Fox News, try and stir outrage over Benghazi 24/7 on a story that doesn’t exist.  Perhaps it hasn’t watched the same channel on Fast and Furious.  Perhaps it hasn’t watched the same channel on the IRS scandal.

Perhaps they consider reporting on Iran Contra or the no-bid contracts of the Iraq war not newsworthy and therefore any reporting on them is creating a double standard.  Perhaps they consider petty political revenge because a politician from the other political party did not endorse their candidate for re-election.  Perhaps they consider investigating whether that revenge broke federal law and whether it affected emergency response to be a non-story that is only reported because it is a Republican.

Building our own wave.

In 2009, Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell were the beneficiaries of the tea party anger purchased with corporate money, promoted by Fox News and organized by FreedomWorks and the Dick Armey in the Summer of 2009.

Christie of New Jersey and McDonnell of Virginia in November 2009 … Scott Brown of Massachusetts in March 2010 … and then the tea party wave election in November 2010 that appeared to sweep away our country’s common sense and which set up gerrymandered Republican majorities in statehouses across the country.

Today’s polls seem to indicate that we have a good chance to turn the tide in Virginia but not much hope in New Jersey where Gov. Chris Christie (R) appears to be a shoo-in for re-election.  

Chris Christie is NOT a Reasonable Republican

A lot of ink is being spent on the story out of New Jersey: President Obama meets with a not-as-batguano-crazy Republican governor as they tour the areas devastated by Super Storm Sandy and talk about rebuilding the Jersey Shore.

But make no mistake: Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) is not a Reasonable Republican. Being less obviously crazy, and occasionally making statements that irritate his teapartying colleagues, does not mean he is any more fit to govern than any other Republican.

The 180 Names of the Wall of Shame

These 180 House members (179 Republicans and 1 Democrat) deserve to have their name emblazoned upon the wall of shame for opposing the expanded Sandy relief package that passed the House of Representatives this evening:

Aderholt

Amash

Amodei

Bachmann

Barr

Barton

Benishek

Bentivolio

Bilirakis

Bishop (UT)

Black

Blackburn

Brady (TX)

Bridenstine

Brooks (AL)

Brooks (IN)

Broun (GA)

Buchanan

Bucshon

Burgess

Calvert

Camp

Campbell

Carter

Cassidy

Chabot

Chaffetz

Coble

Coffman

Collins (GA)

Conaway

Cook

Cooper (D)

Cotton

Daines

DeSantis

DesJarlais

Duffy

Duncan (SC)

Duncan (TN)

Ellmers

Farenthold

Fincher

Fleischmann

Fleming

Flores

Forbes

Fortenberry

Foxx

Franks (AZ)

Gardner

Gibbs

Gingrey (GA)

Gohmert

Goodlatte

Gosar

Gowdy

Granger

Graves (GA)
Griffin (AR)

Griffith (VA)

Guthrie

Hall

Harris

Hartzler

Hastings (WA)

Heck (NV)

Hensarling

Holding

Hudson

Huelskamp

Huizenga (MI)

Hultgren

Hunter

Hurt

Issa

Jenkins

Johnson (OH)

Johnson, Sam

Jones

Jordan

Joyce

Kelly

King (IA)

Kinzinger (IL)

Kline

Labrador

LaMalfa

Lamborn

Lankford

Latham

Latta

Long

Luetkemeyer

Lummis

Marchant

Massie

McCaul

McClintock

McHenry

McMorris Rodgers

Meadows

Messer

Mica

Miller (FL)

Miller (MI)

Miller, Gary

Mullin

Mulvaney

Murphy (PA)

Neugebauer

Noem

Nugent

Nunnelee

Olson

Paulsen

Pearce

Perry

Petri
Pittenger

Pitts

Poe (TX)

Pompeo

Posey

Price (GA)

Radel

Renacci

Ribble

Rice (SC)

Rigell

Roby

Roe (TN)

Rogers (AL)

Rogers (MI)

Rohrabacher

Rokita

Rooney

Roskam

Ross

Rothfus

Royce

Ryan (WI)

Salmon

Scalise

Schock

Schweikert

Scott, Austin

Sensenbrenner

Sessions

Shuster

Simpson

Smith (NE)

Smith (TX)

Southerland

Stewart

Stivers

Stockman

Stutzman

Terry

Thompson (PA)

Thornberry

Tiberi

Tipton

Upton

Wagner

Walberg

Walden

Walorski

Weber (TX)

Webster (FL)

Wenstrup

Westmoreland

Williams

Wilson (SC)

Wittman

Womack

Woodall

Yoder

Yoho

Open Thread: Late Night Grab Bag

According to Congressional Quarterly, in terms of winning Congressional votes on issues he took a stand on, Obama had the most successful Presidential first year in generations (based upon more than five decades of CQ keeping records).

“His success was 96.7 percent on all the votes where we said he had a clear position in both the House and the Senate. That’s an extraordinary number,” Cranford says.

The previous high scores were held by Lyndon Johnson in 1965, with 93 percent, and Dwight Eisenhower, who scored 89 percent in 1953. Cranford notes that George W. Bush’s score hit the high 80s in 2001, the year of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. But Obama surpassed them all, Cranford says.

NPR

While the road gets tougher moving forward (due to members of Congress preparing for their own campaigns/re-election efforts in the 2010 mid-terms and the likely subsequent loss of seats in both House and Senate), Obama has made his first year historic by yet another measure.

Photobucket