Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Weekly Address: President Obama – Reducing Carbon Pollution in Our Power Plants

The President’s Weekly Address post is also the Weekend Open News Thread. Feel free to share other news stories in the comments.

 

From the White HouseWeekly Address

In this week’s address, President Obama discussed new actions by the Environmental Protection Agency to cut dangerous carbon pollution, a plan that builds on the efforts already taken by many states, cities and companies. These new commonsense guidelines to reduce carbon pollution from power plants were created with feedback from businesses, and state and local governments, and they would build a clean energy economy while reducing carbon pollution.

The President discussed this new plan from the Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, D.C., where he visited children whose asthma is aggravated by air pollution. As a parent, the President said he is dedicated to make sure our planet is cleaner and safer for future generations.

Transcript: Weekly Address: Reducing Carbon Pollution in Our Power Plants

Hi, everybody.  I’m here at Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, D.C., visiting with some kids being treated here all the time for asthma and other breathing problems.  Often, these illnesses are aggravated by air pollution – pollution from the same sources that release carbon and contribute to climate change.  And for the sake of all our kids, we’ve got to do more to reduce it.

Earlier this month, hundreds of scientists declared that climate change is no longer a distant threat – it “has moved firmly into the present.” Its costs can be measured in lost lives and livelihoods, lost homes and businesses; and higher prices for food, insurance, and rebuilding.

That’s why, last year, I put forward America’s first climate action plan.  This plan cuts carbon pollution by building a clean energy economy – using more clean energy, less dirty energy, and wasting less energy throughout our economy.

One of the best things we can do for our economy, our health, and our environment is to lead the world in producing cleaner, safer energy – and we’re already generating more clean energy than ever before.  Thanks in part to the investments we made in the Recovery Act, the electricity America generates from wind has tripled.  And from the sun, it’s increased more than tenfold. In fact, every four minutes, another American home or business goes solar – and every panel is pounded into place by a worker whose job cannot be shipped overseas.

We’re wasting less energy, too.  We’ve doubled how far our cars and trucks will go on a gallon of gas by the middle of the next decade, saving you money at the pump – and we’re helping families and businesses save billions with more efficient homes, buildings, and appliances.

This strategy has created jobs, grown our economy, and helped make America more energy independent than we’ve been in decades – all while holding our carbon emissions to levels not seen in about 20 years.  It’s a good start.  But for the sake of our children, we have to do more.

This week, we will. Today, about 40% of America’s carbon pollution comes from power plants.  But right now, there are no national limits to the amount of carbon pollution that existing plants can pump into the air we breathe. None. We limit the amount of toxic chemicals like mercury, sulfur, and arsenic that power plants put in our air and water.  But they can dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into the air.  It’s not smart, it’s not safe, and it doesn’t make sense.

That’s why, a year ago, I directed the Environmental Protection Agency to build on the efforts of many states, cities, and companies, and come up with commonsense guidelines for reducing dangerous carbon pollution from our power plants.  This week, we’re unveiling these proposed guidelines, which will cut down on the carbon pollution, smog, and soot that threaten the health of the most vulnerable Americans, including children and the elderly.  In just the first year that these standards go into effect, up to 100,000 asthma attacks and 2,100 heart attacks will be avoided – and those numbers will go up from there.

These standards were created in an open and transparent way, with input from the business community.  States and local governments weighed in, too.  In fact, nearly a dozen states are already implementing their own market-based programs to reduce carbon pollution.  And over 1,000 mayors have signed agreements to cut their cities’ carbon pollution.

So the idea of setting higher standards to cut pollution at our power plants is not new.  It’s just time for Washington to catch up with the rest of the country.

Now, special interests and their allies in Congress will claim that these guidelines will kill jobs and crush the economy.  Let’s face it, that’s what they always say.

But every time America has set clear rules and better standards for our air, our water, and our children’s health – the warnings of the cynics have been wrong.  They warned that doing something about the smog choking our cities, and acid rain poisoning our lakes, would kill business.  It didn’t.  Our air got cleaner, acid rain was cut dramatically, and our economy kept growing.

These excuses for inaction somehow suggest a lack of faith in American businesses and American ingenuity.  The truth is, when we ask our workers and businesses to innovate, they do.  When we raise the bar, they meet it.  When we restricted cancer-causing chemicals in plastics and leaded fuel in our cars, American chemists came up with better substitutes.  When we phased out the gases that depleted the ozone layer, American workers built better refrigerators and air conditioners.  The fuel standards we put in place a few years ago didn’t cripple automakers; the American auto industry retooled, and today, they’re selling the best cars in the world, with more hybrids, plug-in, and fuel-efficient models to choose from than ever before.

In America, we don’t have to choose between the health of our economy and the health of our children.  The old rules may say we can’t protect our environment and promote economic growth at the same time, but in America, we’ve always used new technology to break the old rules.

As President, and as a parent, I refuse to condemn our children to a planet that’s beyond fixing.  The shift to a cleaner energy economy won’t happen overnight, and it will require tough choices along the way.  But a low-carbon, clean energy economy can be an engine of growth for decades to come.  America will build that engine.  America will build the future.  A future that’s cleaner, more prosperous, and full of good jobs – a future where we can look our kids in the eye and tell them we did our part to leave them a safer, more stable world.

Thanks, and have a great weekend.

Bolding added.

~


14 comments

  1. Already, those vested in our fossil-fuel economy are decrying them:

    1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce

    2. American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

    3. Americans For Prosperity (AFP)

    4. American Coalition for Clean Coal* Electricity (ACCCE)

    5. National Mining Association (NMA)

    6. Heritage Foundation

    7. American Energy Alliance/Institute For Energy Research

    I would say that if these guys are against it, we are definitely on the right track.

    *Clean Coal? PLEASE.

  2. The Perils Of Obama’s Bold Move On Carbon

    As with other issues, the regulation to limit the pollution blamed for global warming from power plants is a compromise for Obama, who again finds himself caught between his aspirations and what is politically and legally possible…

    “It’s going to be like eating spaghetti with a spoon. It can be done, but it’s going to be messy and slow,” said Michael Gerrard, director of the Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University.

    President Obama will be using the Clean Air Act to impose the new rules. Republicans, who have not passed a single jobs bill in their 4 years of control of Congress, is claiming it would kill jobs.

    Harvard University said the regulation wouldn’t just reduce carbon but also would have a beneficial side effect: cleansing the air of other pollutants.

    Environmental groups, meanwhile, are taking credit for helping shape it and arguing it would create jobs, not eliminate them.

    Only one thing is certain … there will be howls from the right and from the coal producing states.

  3. Majority Of Americans Want Obama’s Carbon Rules For Power Plants, Poll Finds

    According to [a Yale University] poll conducted in April, 64 percent of the 1,013 Americans surveyed said they support a strict policy to limit greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants, while 35 percent said they opposed it – a support ratio of nearly two to one. However, the country is divided on the issue by political party, with 80 percent of Democrats in favor of such rules and 56 percent of Republicans against.

    ~

    Krugman: Climate Action Is ‘Remarkably Cheap,’ New EPA Rules Would Give ‘U.S. Economy A Boost’

    Krugman explains that even the latest report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – “clearly meant to convey the impression that the E.P.A.’s new rules would wreak havoc” – actually shows the exact opposite.

       Specifically, the report considers a carbon-reduction program that’s probably considerably more ambitious than we’re actually going to see, and it concludes that between now and 2030 the program would cost $50.2 billion in constant dollars per year. That’s supposed to sound like a big deal. Instead, if you know anything about the U.S. economy, it sounds like Dr. Evil intoning “one million dollars.” These days, it’s just not a lot of money.

    As Krugman notes, our economy is at $17 trillion and growing. So “what the Chamber of Commerce is actually saying is that we can take dramatic steps on climate – steps that would transform international negotiations, setting the stage for global action – while reducing our incomes by only one-fifth of 1 percent. That’s cheap!”

    ~

    Here’s Why The Carbon Regulations EPA Will Announce Monday Are So Important

    – It’s The First Step Towards A Global Solution

    – Climate Change Is A Threat To America And The World

    – U.S. Carbon Emissions Are A Sizable Part Of The Problem

    – Congress Isn’t Going To Do It Anytime Soon

    On that last one, Democrats are becoming more liberal and Republicans more conservative making the possibility of coming together in a bi-partisan way less likely.

  4. Ignoring the “finally” part of this (really, the president can’t rule by fiat and had to wait until it was clear that Congress was hopelessly in thrall with their fossil fuel masters), this is a good piece.

    Obama Finally Keeps His Promise on Climate Change

    We have waited a long time for the EPA to take action. In 2003, a number of states and cities (including New York City) filed a lawsuit arguing that under the Clean Air Act, the EPA had both the authority and the responsibility to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, because they present a clear danger to society. In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with us. Since then, the challenge of climate change has only grown more urgent, and the cost of inaction more dire.

    He points to New York City’s efforts as a model for other states and cities:

    The EPA’s new rules will give all 50 states the flexibility to determine for themselves the most effective ways to reduce their carbon emissions. For instance, states are likely to adopt more energy efficiency measures, as we did in New York City. Although energy efficiency requires upfront costs, those investments get repaid and eventually produce savings. We found that most businesses and building owners understood this, and many of the city’s largest businesses and employers (including hospitals and universities) voluntarily agreed to match the city’s carbon-reduction efforts.

    It is about more than just carbon reduction, it is about immediate gains for the economy and the health of the people in the region:

    New York City’s air is cleaner than it has been in 50 years, and life expectancy has grown much faster than in the rest of the nation. People are living longer and healthier lives, in communities with businesses that are growing and creating jobs: That was our experience with carbon reduction, and more and more cities and towns are experiencing it, too.

    The reality of a shared earth is that one city’s changes will not be enough. As Canada discovered with acid rain, what happens downwind can impact you even if you have the strictest regulations for your country. These new regulations will clean up a pretty large source of GLOBAL pollution and show the leadership that we should have shown back in 2003 … when Mayor Bloomberg’s Republican party was in control of the White House and both houses of Congress.

Comments are closed.