Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

RIP – Anthony Lewis

One of the great journalists of his era, and the man who revolutionized reporting about the Supreme Court, Anthony Lewis, died today from renal and heart failure.  Lewis was 85.

Lewis reported on the Supreme Court  for the New York Times first as correspondent and then later as a columnist.  He later headed the Times bureau in London and wrote extensively on foreign policy issues.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03…

 photo GideonsTrumpet_HB_zpsd293dec9.jpg

Perhaps best known for his stirring 1964 account of the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, which established the right to counsel for poor defendants, Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis also won two Pulitzer Prizes, the first when he worked for the Washington Daily News for his series on the unjust denial of a security clearance to a Navy employee, and the second in 1963 for his reporting on the Supreme Court at the Times.  The citation for the second Pulitzer cited his work reporting on Baker v. Carr, a major redistricting case which helped to establish the principle of one man, one vote.  Curiously, in their decision in Baker, the Court itself cited a law review article on redistricting written by Anthony Lewis.

Lewis, in later years, wrote extensively on foreign policy.  Whether it was with regard to the law or foreign policy, Lewis always wrote in a lucid, easy-to-understand manner — one which explained without talking down to the reader.

Crossposted at the Daily Kos


5 comments

  1. Portlaw

    nobody of that caliber and character (maybe Krugman)writing on its OpEd page today. Keller, Bruni, Dowd, Douthat, Brooks and Co. are very much in the minor leagues.  

  2. Friend Of The Court: How Anthony Lewis Influenced The Justices He Covered

    Lewis’s law review article launching [his apportionment] crusade began by noting that there were, broadly speaking, two types of malapportionment – population inequality and gerrymandering – and then narrowed his focus to population inequality.  Lewis noted that the partisan implications of reapportionment would likely be mixed, with Democrats likely to gain in the North and Republicans in the South, and, with this, seemed to take partisanship off the table.  Instead, he repeated, “Malapportionment has an almost universal rural bias.”  

    The case was finally taken by the court in Baker v. Carr.

    When the case was decided, in March 1962, Justice William Brennan’s opinion for the Court cited Lewis’s Harvard Law Review article in a footnote.  Lewis’s coverage of the decision earned him his second Pulitzer Prize the following year.

Comments are closed.